≡ Menu

When it’s coming at you from all sides…

…sometimes there’s a reason for it.  I place the blame for this post firmly on Adoro and Fr. V – and life in general, but that doesn’t have a blog.

For some time now I’ve been contemplating – and avoiding contemplating – the issue of my vocation.  That contemplation has largely been simultaneously at the root of and caused by my absence from this blog.  I’ve been able to keep myself sufficiently occupied that the only energy I have for large thinking lands squarely on this issue while somehow also making sure I don’t expend enough energy to actually get anywhere in dealing with it.  It has been, one might say, a study in the art of procrastination.

But Adoro’s post on her issues in discernment jolted me.  Thick-headed as I am, even that was insufficient to kick my complacency firmly out of the way.  It took another, and for my reading pattern, almost simultaneous post by Fr. V on largely the same issue to dislodge my perpetual paralysis enough to even contemplate writing about it.  That I’m starting this post at after 11:00 PM is another sign of how intransigent my procrastination has become.

As a quick rewind, there was a time before I entered the Church and for some time after when I was quite sure I would some day become a priest.  It was quite simply a fait accompli, only awaiting the Bishop’s invitation and confirmation.  I was not dissuaded from this perception by anyone for any reason and was quite thoroughly comfortable with the idea of never belonging to myself again.  Until that plan crashed in brilliant flames in the office of the Diocesan Vocations Director.  I still have but a muddled memory of that meeting and subsequent drive home.  How it all happened, how it all worked I’m still not entirely sure, but by the time that day was over I knew I would never be a priest.  Not being one to dwell immediately on the past I put that to rest and set out to find to what new life God had called me.

Since then life has been full of the things that make the average life.  There have been plenty of ups and a good number of downs, times when I could sense God right next to me and times when I had to fight to keep the mere concept of Him alive in my head.  Through it all there has been this underlying current of a whisper I once heard in a dream, “I have something better for you.”  That statement has so many layers of meaning my mind quivers at the thought.

I spent time as an, if you will, “average” Catholic just attending Mass and raising my family and not getting any more involved than that.  It was a good life, a very good life, but it was a fight within myself to not do something more.  Never having been one to do anything halfway I took it as a personal challenge to keep in that middle one way or another.  I’d offered my very existence and was told that wasn’t what was desired of me; any pretensions to the contrary were to me only an effect of an ego still not quite sure of itself.  Yet there was that gnawing need to do something more; not something “different” as a replacement of what I had been doing, but a more that added to it.

Then my son began school and the impropriety of my standing on the sidelines wondering about the state of the Church he was about to discover but never involving myself in any effort to make it better sprang on me in a way that was utterly unexpected.  At my wife’s behest I did an end-run around my complacency and signed up to work with the RCIA team at our parish.  Still being unable to do anything halfway I have spent the time ever since devouring books that I might begin to have a clue sufficient to teach those souls for whom I now held some responsibility at least something of use.

And yet, after some time even that was not satiating the do-more beast.  The battle was waged within me once more.  More than once I yelled to myself, “this is it, all that I have, there’s nothing more to give!”  I didn’t even convince myself but I was willing to have the argument none the less.

Two things happened in short succession that have started that whole gristmill churning again.  First, I happened across a copy of St. Dominic and the Rosary, a hagiography on St. Dominic targeted largely for children.  Strange though it may seem, it was like a giant battery was attached to my vocational battery.  Reading how St. Dominic confronted the heresy of his day and reconverted so many fallen-away Catholics was like an invitation written in time and placed directly in front of me.  Here was a man, simple of means, who set an example from which I simply could not tear myself.  The Dominican Order is, without a doubt, entirely intriguing to me; I do not consider it a coincidence that St. Catherine of Siena is the patron saint of my parish.

Then one day, in so many words and at least to me completely out of the blue, my wife asked me if I’d ever considered becoming a Deacon.  All these pretensions about living a simple average life were being smashed to kindling at a rapid pace.  My mind raced to find excuses – “I’m too young, they’d never accept me”; “maybe when the kids are out of school”; “I’d just never be any good at any of it” – yes, the usual suspects.  If my wife, who knows me better than anyone in this world, thinks I might have that calling …  My head continues to spin.

I have never, ever, been one to like to step foot in a situation I did not fully understand from the beginning.  Yet I find myself surrounded of late by reminders that Christ calls us to faith not proof, trust not pre-made decisions.  Am I being asked to ask the Church to serve in a special way once again?  What will happen if She says no?  What will happen if She says yes?  Trust.  Faith.

So, at the end of this entirely-too-long post I only hope you have some small understanding of why I’ve been so lax in posting of late.  With our RCIA classes having just started up again and my heart, mind and soul slowly working through this series of questions I’m sure I’ll have plenty about which to post.  I only hope it isn’t as dizzying for you the reader as it has been for me.  Thy Will be done, Lord.

{ 2 comments }

What keeps me up at night?

When they had finished breakfast, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?”  He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.”  He said to him, “Feed my lambs.”  A second time he said to him, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?”  He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.”  He said to him, “Tend my sheep.”  He said to him the third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?”  Peter was grieved because he said to him a third time, “Do you love me?”  And he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.”  Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep.” — John 21:15-17

Before anyone asks, this isn’t going to be a treatment of the issue of agape and filio in this selection.  While I find that both stimulating and moving, it’s not why I’m here today.  That said…

For some reason this passage came into my head several days ago and I’ve been mulling it over ever since.  I’ve always felt a particular attachment to Peter due to the dual reasons of our shared name and personality.  And perhaps because we both continually find new ways to screw up and are gently dusted off by our Lord and set on a straight path again.

It is with that in mind that I look at this not as a proof-text but as something even greater than the simple words on the page.  To me this is not just a conversation between two men, or even between a man and God – it is a question asked to each and every one of us and a way of framing every decision we make in our lives from here on out.  Do you love me more than these?

Several days ago my best friend’s father passed away.  This got me thinking about the judgment each person faces after death.  Now, as far as I know, the Church has no official teaching about how exactly this judgment will go, but I get the feeling this question will have something to do with it – Do you love me more than these?  Imagine having that question posed to you by Jesus Himself, seeing the nail marks in His hands and then saying, “yes Lord, I do.”  I wonder … could I say that?  Could I say it now, will I be able to say it then?

There is, of course, more to it than that.  One question has long vexed me – who or what are the “these” to which He refers?  Generally it’s understood Jesus is asking Peter if he loves Him more than do the other Apostles.  That is not however, at least in the English translation, the only way it can be interpreted.

Wrapped in the question is also, “do you love me more than these” – i.e. does your love for Jesus outweigh your love for everyone else, even your closest friends and family.  Does Jesus come first, and do you really love everyone else through the lens of your love for Him?  It sounds like an easy question to answer to many, but when you really get down and wrestle with it, well, do I?

The net can be cast yet wider too.  Do I love Him more than all the other gadgets, gizmos, trophies, quests, people and places in my life?  When it comes down to it, when my love for Him is placed on one side of a scale and my love for all the other people, places and things in my life on the other, which way would it tip?  When I look at the places I go, the people I see, the things I do – do they resonate with a love for Him that surpasses my love for anything else?  Do I, really, love Him more than these?

Thoughts such as these are usually greeted with a friendly reminder about keeping balance in life.  As much as I appreciate these comments, and I truly do for my life seems to have all the balance of a broken Weeble-wobble at times, it stands in stark contrast to the complete, and some would say reckless, abandon found in the examples of so many of the saints.  It is, as a friend said recently, very hard to look a spouse or a child right in the eye and know that we are called to love God even more.

The call, it seems, is impossible.  But that doesn’t make it any less real or any less necessary.  For me, for you, this is impossible, but only if we do it alone.  There are no unfunded mandates with God; all we have to do is step back, relax, and cooperate with the grace God offers us.  The only thing stopping us … is us.  So, “Do you love me more than these?”  Lord, help me to love You that much.

{ 0 comments }

Hell, or thereabouts

As part of a discussion I was having the other day someone said, “I’m of the opinion that not very many people go to Hell.”  That statement has been clanging around in my head ever since then and it just isn’t quite sitting right.  I know it’s a very popular belief in this day and age but when you look across the broad cross-section of Catholic history and inside the Bible the concept of an empty or nearly-empty Hell is hard to find.  Now, it’s possible this is another case where God is reaching people “where they are” in history and all the Biblical warnings about the ease of going to Hell and the difficulty of attaining Heaven are merely purposeful hyperbole.  I grant that possibility, but I confess I haven’t seen the kind of exegesis that suggests it is a likely, let alone the most likely, option.

Let’s start first with the words of Jesus in Mattew 7:13-14:

Enter by the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is easy, that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. For the gate is narrow and the way is hard, that leads to life, and those who find it are few.

That certainly doesn’t sound much like words suggesting there’s a buyer’s market for real estate in Hell.  I’m quite desperately trying to come up with a way around it but I simply can’t find one.

Add on to that the number of times Jesus repeats warnings about Hell and the human capacity to end up there (e.g. Matt 3:12, Matt 5:29, Matt 8:28, Matt 13:30 etc.).  Add to that the number of times it is found in the epistles (e.g. 2 Thess 1:9, 1 Pet 4:17).  If God is using hyperbole through the Scriptures to, if you will, “scare us straight” He certainly is laying it on with a heavy hand.

There is also the quote, variously attributed to St. Theresa of Avila and Mary at Fatima, tracked down at Fr. Z’s to an actual quote from St. Therese of Liseux that souls are lost like “snowflakes”.  Again, the quote attributed loosely to St. Athanasius that the floor of Hell is paved with the skulls of Bishops.  The list goes on, but this is not an exercise in pounding the reader into either submission or boredom with an excess of talking points.

Let me reduce it down the way my brain processes it:

  1. Jesus says there is a Hell.
  2. Jesus says we can end up there and lays out various things that will get us there.
  3. Jesus doesn’t lie.
  4. We’re not perfect, and we sometimes break the very commands He tells us will earn us Hell

ergo, we could wind up in Hell.

To be perfectly honest I find some modicum of comfort in the idea that it is nearly impossible to go to Hell, but I also find a tremendously dangerous impulse to spiritual sloth hidden just beneath the surface of that idea.  How does one earn Hell?  That’s something God has not entirely revealed to us, or at least not in a way we haven’t managed to muddle with sophistries.  We’ll hear about how God is so loving and all-powerful He would never allow a single soul to go to Hell.  But then … if He could undo all His warnings with a snap of His fingers, why did He have to come, live, suffer, die and rise again to open Heaven for us?  If we believe the latter, how can we say the former?  And again, God would not warn us about an easy-to-earn Hell if Heaven were in fact our only, or even almost-only, destination.

So where does that leave us?  Right back with what the Church teaches:

To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God’s merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice.  This state of definitive self-exclusion from Communion with God and the blessed is called “hell”. (CCC #1033)

The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. (CCC #1035)

Mother Angelica of EWTN fame once said that too many people aim for Purgatory.  But what, she asked, if they fall just short?  There’s nothing below Purgatory other than Hell.  Aim instead, she said, for Heaven.  That way if you fall short you still land in Purgatory.  Of course, she delivered it far better than did I with all her usual wit and charm.

So let me summarize it a slightly different way than before.  Hell is real and it is eternal.  And it doesn’t matter if there is room for only one person in Hell, if that person is you.

{ 3 comments }

Riddle me this

This question has been rattling around my cranium for some time, and I’d like to let others ruminate on it with me.

If He came to die for you

why can’t you just live for Him?

I am more convicted by this question every day, and every day I see more how far I am from it even though it seems so simple.  Now seems like a good time to start…

{ 0 comments }

Comic relief for the day

As an iPhone owner, this short video really strikes a chord.  Right in the funny bone.

If you haven’t visited SQPN, well, why not?  They are a constant companion for me through my work day.

{ 0 comments }

Sorry for the slight delay

With this being the first week the kids are out of school, plus the week of my son’s ninth birthday, it’s been rather hectic around here.  I’m working on a post that I want to get right so please, do be patient.  It’s a virtue, doncha know.

{ 0 comments }

If you need a pick-me-up

Go read this post from Fr. V. at Adam’s Ale.  Trust me.  God knows what He’s doing.

{ 0 comments }

Another vocations video

This one from the folks at CNA.

H/T to Benedict on plurk.

{ 0 comments }

A new petition for your perusal

Deborah Morlani (of NLM fame) has set up a petition with an interesting premise – to request, nay demand, politicians stop using the phrase “pro-life except in cases of rape, incest or the health of the mother:.  Some may say it’s not the opportune time for such strict language demands, but we are also faced with the fact that the corruption of our language is one of the many roots of the cultural and spiritual malaise in which we currently find our country and our world.  Even if you don’t agree with the petition, at least go and read it and we can all enter into a discussion about it.  The first step to solving the problem of abortion is, like in a twelve-step program, admitting it exists.

{ 0 comments }

The dangers of music

In an effort to get my new blogging string off to a roaring start, I thought I’d pull a draft from the archives that I didn’t quite have the guts to finish blogging before.  In all the discussions I’ve had with people from the many corners of the Catholic faith I’ve found that not even the issue of denying the Eucharist to pro-abortion politicians invokes the level of emotion one finds in a discussion about … liturgical music.

I have to admit that I don’t yet know why this is so but it seems there is some sort of innate personal identification between music and belief.  I think there are two aspects which form this identification: 1) the ages old maxim lex orandi, lex credendi (or, the law of prayer is the law of faith) ; and 2) an innate understanding that liturgical music is a part of the Mass, not added to it – that it flows from the faith expressed in the Mass and is a part of it.

But that’s not what I’m here for with this post.  I’m here to cause a little trouble with a quote from then Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger’s The Spirit of the Liturgy, a work I’d say is a must-read for anyone interested in discussing the Catholic liturgy in the modern day.  Why cause trouble?  Because he displays the question of music in the liturgy in this quote in a way that opens the discussion on both sides of the new music / traditional music divide with equal parts gratitude and remorse for those who would hold to either.  In just this short paragraph he gives everyone a great deal to think about and an opportunity to reassess old positions.  And people wonder why I’m so impressed with this Pope…  Here’s what he had to say:

As the Church was uprooted from her Semitic soil and moved into the Greek world, a spontaneous and far-reaching fusion took place with Greek logos mysticism, with its poetry and music, that eventually threatened to dissolve Christianity into a generalized mysticism. It was precisely hymns and their music that provided the point of entry for Gnosticism, that deadly temptation which began to subvert Christianity from within. And so it is understandable that, in their struggle for the identity of the faith and its rooting in the historical figure of Jesus Christ, the Church authorities resorted to a radical decision. The fifty-ninth canon of the Council of Laodicea forbids the use of privately composed psalms and non-canonical writings in divine worship. The fifteenth canon restricts the singing of psalms to the choir of psalm-singers, while “other people in church should not sing.” That is how post-biblical hymns were almost entirely lost. There was a rigorous return to the restrained, purely vocal style of singing taken over from the synagogue. We may regret the cultural impoverishment this entailed, but it was necessary for the sake of a greater good. A return to apparent cultural poverty saved the identity of biblical faith, and the very rejection of false inculturation opened up the cultural breadth of Christianity for the future.

So now, I ask you, what does it say to you?  I find great challenge for those on both sides of the debate in this writing, but I’m curious if I’m alone.  Don’t let the combox grow cobwebs…

{ 1 comment }